|
| ¼ÇÑ |
Ç×ÀǼÇÑ |
|
| ¸Åü |
À¥»çÀÌÆ®
|
|
| À̽´ |
|
|
| ¾ð¾î |
¿µ¾î
|
|
| ¼ÇѺ¸³»´Â°÷ |
The National Bureau of Asian Research(NBR) |
|
| ¿À·ù³»¿ë |
µ¶µµ¿µÀ¯±Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀϺ»ÀÇ ÀÔÀåÀ» ´ãÀº ÀϺ»±³¼öÀÇ ÁÖÀ常À» °ÔÀç |
|
| E-mail / Contact |
media@nbr.org |
|
¼·Ð |
To
whom it may concern,
Hello,
I am JW Park, a 2nd grade student in the middle school of South
Korea and also a member of ¡°cyber group for correcting errors on Dokdo.¡±
I
happened to visit your website and read a commentary by Kazuhiko Togosee. His argument is clearly based on Japanese claim on
Dokdo.
Unfortunately,
I found no other commentaries that defends Korean standing on Dokdo. So, I think
that your manner of posting of the commentary on this issue is obviously
biased to Japanese claim.
|
|
| º»·Ð |
Historically
and legally, Dokdo has been clear and evident territory to Korea since 512 A.D.
even before 20th century. The records of Dokdo are frequently found in the Korean historical
books such as the Chronicles of the Three States and the Annals of the Joseon
Dynasty. The only time when Korea lost its sovereignty over Dokdo was from 1905
when Japanese imperialism took away the Korean diplomatic autonomy by force, to
1945 when it was the last year Korea had been Imperialist Japanese colony. Even after World
War II, the Allied countries clearly affirmed by SCAPIN 677 in 1946 that Ulleung
Island and Dokdo was not the territories of Japan.
|
|
| °á·Ð |
As
a Korean, I am duly eligible to make a strong complaint about your website for
posting only commentary based on Japanese ungrounded claim. It is not
justifiable and balanced posting. In addition, I should request you to check out
the right and just historical facts on Dokdo and correct your manner of postings on Dokdo
based on historical facts as soon as possible.
|